Biographic28,973
Bibliographic93,167
Victim of Torture1,088
ID: | PHI0022 | ||||
Name
ឈ្មោះ
|
Kuy Phang
គុយ ប៉ង
|
||||
Gender
|
M
|
||||
ភេទ
|
ប្រុស
|
||||
Status
|
Alive
|
||||
ស្ថានភាពគ្រួសារ
|
នៅរស់
|
||||
Source Interview
|
PHI002220130516,Koh Ker village,Srayang commune,Koulen district, Preah Vihear province.Interviewed by Long Dany. Note: Interviewed with Kuy Phang,male, 49 year-old,No Biography.
|
||||
ប្រភពនៃឯកសារ/បទសម្ភាសន៍
|
ភីអេកអាយ០០២២២០១៣០៥១៦, ភូមិកោះកេ្តរិ៍ ឃុំស្រយ៉ង់ ស្រុកគូលែន ខេត្តសៀមរាប។ សម្ភាសន៍ដោយៈ ឡុង ដានី។ កំណត់សម្គាល់ៈ ជួបជាមួយឈ្មោះ គុយ ប៉ង ភេទប្រុស អាយុ៥៣ឆ្នាំ ក្រៅប្រវត្តិរូប។
|
||||
Date of Birth
|
[Prensent age 49 years old]
|
||||
ថ្ងៃ-ខែ-ឆ្នាំ កំណើត
|
«បច្ចុប្បន្នអាយុ៤៩ឆ្នាំ»
|
||||
Home Village
|
13040504Kdat village, Phnom Tbeng commune, Koulen
|
||||
ទីកន្លែងកំណើត
|
១៣០៤០៥០៤ភូមិក្ដាក់ ឃុំភ្នំត្បែង ស្រុកគូលែន ខេត្ដព្
|
||||
ការចូលរួមសកម្មភាពក្នុងសម័យខ្មែរក្រហម
|
១៩៧០????
|
||||
Reason to Join KR
|
Volunteer.
|
||||
មូលហេតុចូលរួមសកម្មភាពក្នុងសម័យខ្មែរក្រហម
|
ស្ម័គ្រចិត្ដ។
|
||||
DK ORG Unit 75-79
|
Children Unit center at Prah Vihear province.
|
||||
អង្គភាពក្នុងរបបខ្មែរក្រហម(1975-79)
|
អង្គភាពកងកុមារនៅខេត្ដព្រះវិហារ។
|
||||
KR Rank(1975-79)
|
Children Unit.
|
||||
តួនាទីក្នុងរបបខ្មែរក្រហម(1975-79)
|
កងកុមារ។
|
||||
DK Zone 75-79
|
Region103,Prah Vihear Province.
|
||||
ទីតាំងភូមិសាស្រ្តក្នុងរបបខ្មែរក្រហម(1975-79)
|
តំបន់១០៣ ខេត្ដព្រះវិហារ។
|
||||
Superior
|
Ta Hang was Chief of Region.
|
||||
អ្នកដឹកនាំ
|
តា ហង់(គណៈតំបន់)។
|
||||
Associates
|
|
||||
អ្នកពាក់ព័ន្ធដ៏ទៃទៀត
|
|
||||
Summary
|
Kuy Pang, male, 53 years old, lives in Rumchek village Srayang commune, Koulen district, Preah Vihear province.
Pang៌s wife៌s name is Put Savy. Pang is the village៌s chief.
Pang was born in Kdat village, Phnom Tbeng commune, Sangkum Thmei district, Preah Vihear province. Pang៌s father៌s name is Kuy Pil and his mother៌s is Chin Sen. He has five brothers and two sisters and is second in his family. He studied to grade 3 when he was young. Soon after the coup d៌etat in 1970, the KR arrived in his village and made propaganda. At that time, Ta Sruoch was the chief of the KR stationed in his village.
In 1973, most of villagers joined the KR, and they collected their property to put in communal place. However, the KR still allowed each family to eat.
After April 1975 the KR took many new people (17 Mesa people) to live in the village and all of the people were forced to eat in the communal hall and work together in a cooperative. Pang was assigned to a child unit in the village. He and the others children were ordered to work in rice fields and look after cows and buffaloes. The office of Preah Vihear Region (103) was in Rovieng district. Ta Hang was the chief of the region.
After the KR collapsed in 1979, Pang lived with his family in Kdat village. However, the village was unstable because of the KR came to fight against the Vietnamese in the village. The villagers always fled from the village and found a safe place.
In 1991, Pang married Put Savy in Koh Ker village and moved to live with his wife in the village. There, Pang joined the KR. He was a soldier in the KR 612 division. Ta Hoeun and Van Kosal were the leaders of the Division. Pang was promoted to be a commander of battalion 71 within regiment 18, Division 612 a few years later. His unit was ordered to station itself in the Koh Ker area. Pang said that sometimes his unit fired against a division of the Cambodian government in the area. Srey Doek was the chief of the division.
After the KR integrated with the government in 1999, Phang retired from the military and returned to live in Rumchek village. He is currently the village chief.
|
||||
Copyright
|
© DC-CAM
|
||||
រក្សាសិទ្ធិដោយ
|
© មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលឯកសារកម្ពុជា
|
Refine your results
Database
Location
Date
1970 to 197515,216
1975 to 198022,831
1980 to 198511,450
1985 to 199012,168
1990 to 199510,122
1995 to 20001,255
2000 to 20104,840
Note that the written permission of the copyright owners and/or other rights holders (such as publicity and/or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Credit Line: Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives.
"Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives"
This website was funded in part by a grant (Documentation and Democracy) from the United States Department of State. The opinions, findings and conclusions stated herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development.
Concept by Ean Panharith and Youk Chhang
© 2023 Documentation Center of Cambodia
The Prevention and Punishment of the Crimes of Genocide
By Youk Chhang
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide stands alongside the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one of the key pillars of international human rights law, and for this Human Rights Day in 2022, I want to highlight the critical importance of the responsibility to prevent atrocity crimes, which includes genocide. When atrocity crimes occur, there is an immediate need to stop these atrocious acts, followed by the equally urgent tasks of documenting, investigating, and ultimately prosecuting the perpetrators. However, from 1948 to today, we have not given enough attention to true prevention.
Atrocity crimes do not occur in a vacuum. There is a long chain of events and conditions that precede atrocity crimes. Isolation, segregation, and discrimination frequently, if not always, precede the rationalization of atrocity crimes against a group of people. And before people are discriminated against, they must be dehumanized. The process of dehumanization depends upon rationalizing hatred and distrust, and these processes are precipitated by misinformation, fueled by uninformed biases, stereotypes, and exploitative actors. They are also frequently dependent upon the disintegration, corruption, or lack of development of critical institutions, in particular institutions dedicated to dialogue and education. It is here that we must dedicate our greatest attention.
Since 1948, we have made great strides toward taking actions that interrupt, mitigate, and to a very limited extent, punish the chief perpetrators of atrocity crimes; however, these actions are not preventative but reactive in nature. No atrocities crime trial has ever prevented the next genocide, and no sanctions or punishment can bring back the dead or undo the trauma that extends across multiple generations. Indeed, the trauma of atrocity crimes in the distant past are often the forgotten seeds for the next wave of violence and inhumanity of the future.
If we are to truly adopt strategies that are effective, far reaching, and decisive in preventing atrocity crimes, then our priorities must be re-oriented to the opposite end of the spectrum, where the seeds of the next genocide are cultivated. Our responsibility in complying with foundational human rights documents should be measured not solely by our success at responding, investigating, and prosecuting atrocity crimes, but by our efforts in supporting institutions, initiatives, and actions that have a positive influence in preventing all forms of inhumanity. The most effective strategy at preventing the next genocide is centered on actions and policies that interrupt and reduce the risk of escalation at the earliest stages of inhumanity.
Cambodia recently removed human rights days from public calendars. I think we should reconsider this collective decision. Cambodia has achieved extraordinary success in its genocide education programme, which is the essence of atrocity crimes prevention. And so, to capitalize on this success and Cambodia’s regional and even global leadership in this area, we should hold an annual dialogue on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) closes its doors, there is no better time than now to preserve Cambodia’s leadership and momentum in realizing the core objectives of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam) is proud of the support it has given to the ECCC’s work, which was fundamental to giving victims an opportunity to participate in the justice process and realize some sense of closure from the Khmer Rouge genocide. DC-Cam is also eager to support an annual conference on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As we commemorate this Human Rights Day, we would be mindful to recognize our fundamental human rights documents are not only universal commitments, but also standards for evaluating the kind of world we are leaving for the next generation.
—————
Youk Chhang is Executive Director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia. The Center dedicating to Justice, Memory, and Healing for survivors of the Khmer Rouge genocide.
Photo above: Children at Angkor Wat, 1979. After the collapse of the Khmer Rouge regime on 7 January 1979, hundreds of thousands of children were left orphaned. From 1975 to 1979, the Khmer Rouge led Cambodia into tragedy causing the deaths of over 2 million people. Although two millions were killed, five millions more survived to tell their story. The perpetrators of these crimes also survived. Photo: Documentation Center of Cambodia Archives.
Mansion 11, Street 256
Sangkat Chakto Mukh, Khan Daun Penh
Phnom Penh, 120207, CAMBODIA
t: +855 (0) 92 234 707
e: truthpheana.s@databases.dccam.org
e: dccam@online.com.kh
If you have problem to access, please contact:
Morm Sophat, IT Coordinator
t: +855 (0) 11/16 27 27 22
e: truthsophat.m@databases.dccam.org