Biographic28,821
Bibliographic93,161
Record No
លេខឯកសារ
|
VPA-KT0004 | |
Name
ឈ្មោះ
|
Chiep Ean
ជៀប អ៊ាន
| |
Gender
ភេទ
|
Male
ភេទ: ប្រុស
|
|
Age
អាយុ
|
59 | |
Nationality
|
Khmer
|
|
Ethnicity
|
Khmer
|
|
Birth Place
|
Thlok Andaung village, Chey commune, Kampong Svay district, Kampong Thom province
|
|
Occupation
|
Farmer
|
|
Current Address
|
Trapeang Thma village, Salavisay commune, Prasat Balangk, Kampong Thom province
|
|
Mode Participation
|
Complainant
|
|
Request Protective Measures
|
No;
|
|
Prefer form of Reparation
|
Genocide education
|
|
Main Crime Date
កាលបរិច្ឆេទឧក្រិដ្ឋកម្មសំខាន់ៗ
|
1975 |
Main Crime Location
|
Detention Approximately three or four months after the liberation of Phnom Penh city, I was imprisoned in Chy Nith village, Chy Nith commune, Kampong Svay district, Kampong Thom province. District militants and “base� people came to arrest me. I remember that Pheap, a female base comrade, was one of the people who received orders from the cooperative level to come arrest me. I did not recognize the other district militants who accompanied her. At the time of the arrest, I was living in Khmakk Chas village, Salavisay commune, Prasat Balangkdistrict, Kampong Thom province. The Khmer Rouge security police accused me of being involved in a traitorous network, because my three brothers, Chieb Lao, Chieb Eat, and Chieb Uch, were former Lon Nol soldiers. Ninety-five days after being detained, I was released. I have no idea why they released me. They interrogated me three to five times a month, asking me over and over again about the supposed traitorous network and the number of times I met up with my brothers. I had neither met up with my brothers nor been involved in a traitorous network. They beat me with a stick and sometimes even strangled my neck using string. This torture caused me pain and suffering to the point that I could not do heavy work. During the detention, I met lots of other prisoners: possibly up to one thousand fellow detainees. Three other people, Saing, Kuon, and Kien (deceased), were released together with me. Saing and Kuon are my siblings and currently live in Etkoma village, Kampongsvay commune, Kampongsvay district, Kampong Thom. |
Others Crime
|
The death of my mother, Uk Sao.
During my detention, my mother was evacuated to Porporkanlaungkranhh, Stung district, Kampong Thom province. Due to malnutrition and depression resulting from my detention, she lost her life there. After being evacuated to Porporkanlaungkranhh, she lived with her sons-in-law, Hem Hou and Nuon Khatt. My brother-in-law told me that my mother died a year after the evacuation. The Khmer Rouge decided to move my mother because her three children used to serve as Lon Nol soldiers. A commune chief was responsible for this relocation.
The death of my 3 brothers: Chieb Lao, Chiet Eat, and Chieb Uch.
About a month after the liberation of Phnom Penh, my brothers, Chieb Lao and Chieb Eat, were taken to be killed in Chramas village, Sambour commune, Prasat Sambour district, Kampong Thom province. A base person named Leng and district militants came to arrest my brothers and subsequently killed them at a detention center in Chramas village. Accused of being Lon Nol soldiers, they were both killed on the same day. At this time, a district militant informed me of their deaths. A village chief named Sun had called my brothers to come to his house and then killed them there.
Another brother, Chieb Uch, was executed in Siem Reap after the liberation of Phnom Penh in 1975. I received this news from Ta Tob (deceased), who had served as a soldier alongside my brother. Chieb Uch was killed because he had been a soldier.
|
Date Completion of Form
កាលបរិច្ឆេទនៃការបំពេញបែបបទ
|
20080328 | |
Petitioner
អ្នកដាក់ញ្ញាត់
|
No; | |
Copyright: | © DC-CAM | |
រក្សាសិទ្ធិដោយ: | © មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលឯកសារកម្ពុជា |
Refine your results
Database
Biographic28,821
Bibliographic93,161
Location
Date
1970 to 197515,209
1975 to 198022,829
1980 to 198511,450
1985 to 199012,169
1990 to 199510,122
1995 to 20001,254
2000 to 20104,840
Note that the written permission of the copyright owners and/or other rights holders (such as publicity and/or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Credit Line: Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives.
"Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives"
This website was funded in part by a grant (Documentation and Democracy) from the United States Department of State. The opinions, findings and conclusions stated herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development.
Concept by Ean Panharith and Youk Chhang
© 2023 Documentation Center of Cambodia
The Prevention and Punishment of the Crimes of Genocide
By Youk Chhang
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide stands alongside the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one of the key pillars of international human rights law, and for this Human Rights Day in 2022, I want to highlight the critical importance of the responsibility to prevent atrocity crimes, which includes genocide. When atrocity crimes occur, there is an immediate need to stop these atrocious acts, followed by the equally urgent tasks of documenting, investigating, and ultimately prosecuting the perpetrators. However, from 1948 to today, we have not given enough attention to true prevention.
Atrocity crimes do not occur in a vacuum. There is a long chain of events and conditions that precede atrocity crimes. Isolation, segregation, and discrimination frequently, if not always, precede the rationalization of atrocity crimes against a group of people. And before people are discriminated against, they must be dehumanized. The process of dehumanization depends upon rationalizing hatred and distrust, and these processes are precipitated by misinformation, fueled by uninformed biases, stereotypes, and exploitative actors. They are also frequently dependent upon the disintegration, corruption, or lack of development of critical institutions, in particular institutions dedicated to dialogue and education. It is here that we must dedicate our greatest attention.
Since 1948, we have made great strides toward taking actions that interrupt, mitigate, and to a very limited extent, punish the chief perpetrators of atrocity crimes; however, these actions are not preventative but reactive in nature. No atrocities crime trial has ever prevented the next genocide, and no sanctions or punishment can bring back the dead or undo the trauma that extends across multiple generations. Indeed, the trauma of atrocity crimes in the distant past are often the forgotten seeds for the next wave of violence and inhumanity of the future.
If we are to truly adopt strategies that are effective, far reaching, and decisive in preventing atrocity crimes, then our priorities must be re-oriented to the opposite end of the spectrum, where the seeds of the next genocide are cultivated. Our responsibility in complying with foundational human rights documents should be measured not solely by our success at responding, investigating, and prosecuting atrocity crimes, but by our efforts in supporting institutions, initiatives, and actions that have a positive influence in preventing all forms of inhumanity. The most effective strategy at preventing the next genocide is centered on actions and policies that interrupt and reduce the risk of escalation at the earliest stages of inhumanity.
Cambodia recently removed human rights days from public calendars. I think we should reconsider this collective decision. Cambodia has achieved extraordinary success in its genocide education programme, which is the essence of atrocity crimes prevention. And so, to capitalize on this success and Cambodia’s regional and even global leadership in this area, we should hold an annual dialogue on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) closes its doors, there is no better time than now to preserve Cambodia’s leadership and momentum in realizing the core objectives of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam) is proud of the support it has given to the ECCC’s work, which was fundamental to giving victims an opportunity to participate in the justice process and realize some sense of closure from the Khmer Rouge genocide. DC-Cam is also eager to support an annual conference on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As we commemorate this Human Rights Day, we would be mindful to recognize our fundamental human rights documents are not only universal commitments, but also standards for evaluating the kind of world we are leaving for the next generation.
—————
Youk Chhang is Executive Director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia. The Center dedicating to Justice, Memory, and Healing for survivors of the Khmer Rouge genocide.
Photo above: Children at Angkor Wat, 1979. After the collapse of the Khmer Rouge regime on 7 January 1979, hundreds of thousands of children were left orphaned. From 1975 to 1979, the Khmer Rouge led Cambodia into tragedy causing the deaths of over 2 million people. Although two millions were killed, five millions more survived to tell their story. The perpetrators of these crimes also survived. Photo: Documentation Center of Cambodia Archives.
Mansion 11, Street 256
Sangkat Chakto Mukh, Khan Daun Penh
Phnom Penh, 120207, CAMBODIA
t: +855 (0) 92 234 707
e: truthpheana.s@databases.dccam.org
e: dccam@online.com.kh
If you have problem to access, please contact:
Morm Sophat, IT Coordinator
t: +855 (0) 11/16 27 27 22
e: truthsophat.m@databases.dccam.org