Biographic28,821
Bibliographic93,161
Record No
លេខឯកសារ
|
VPA-KD0008 | |
Name
ឈ្មោះ
|
Im Proeung
អ៊ឹម ព្រឿង
| |
Gender
ភេទ
|
Male
ភេទ: ប្រុស
|
|
Date Of Birth
ថ្ងៃ-ខែ-ឆ្នាំកំណើត
|
19390106 | |
Nationality
|
Khmer
|
|
Ethnicity
|
Khmer
|
|
Birth Place
|
Cheung Prey Village, Ampeou Prey Commune, Kandal Stung District,
|
|
Occupation
|
Farmer (layman)
|
|
Current Address
|
Cheung Prey Village, Ameou Prey Commune, Kandal Stung District, Kandal Province
|
|
Mode Participation
|
Complainant
|
|
Request Protective Measures
|
No;
|
|
Prefer form of Reparation
|
Mental hospital
|
|
Main Crime Date
កាលបរិច្ឆេទឧក្រិដ្ឋកម្មសំខាន់ៗ
|
1975 |
Main Crime Location
|
About five months after 17 April 1975, the Khmer Rouge cadres in Siem Reap Commune of Kandal Stung District arrested and detained me in Sang Prison, Tonle Bati [Bati River], by telling me that they needed my help to carry a long piece of bamboo which was used for climbing sugar palm trees. Along with me, the Khmer Rouge took one of my blacksmith team members, Tev Ton, as well as four other people whom I had never met before. When we reached the area north of Sang Tonle Bati, the Khmer Rouge soldiers pointed their guns at us, ordering us to raise our hands and turn to face them. They then ordered all of us to lie down facing the ground and they restrained us by pressing a foot on our back. Then they tied our hands behind our backs. After that, they ordered us to stand in line and they frisked us for tobacco, lighters and other valuable objects. Next, they told us to walk straight to Sang Tonle Bati. A Khmer Rouge soldier named Yav kicked us before putting us in a cell and shackling our legs. Seven days later, Yav released Tev Ton and me from the cell because our blacksmith skills were needed inside the prison compound. A month later, the Khmer Rouge soldier took me to the Tonle Bati riverbank nearby in order to inquire about my background. My legs were still shackled and my hands remained tied behind my back. Three other Khmer Rouge cadres also interrogated me at that time. One conducted the interrogation while the other two held a bamboo pole and recorded my biography. They told me that I had to answer what was being asked. First, the Khmer Rouge cadre asked, “Did you join the white Khmer?� I answered, “Yes.� They continued: “What job did they order you to do?� I responded that I did the farming. They asked further, “What is the name of the leader?� I told them he was the Ampeou Prey Commune Chief named Chan. They then laughed. They followed by asking, “What did you do in Phnom Penh? Were you a captain?� I said I was a captain. “How much was your salary?� they asked. “Ten thousand,� I answered. They continued, “What was your commander’s name?� I was silent for a moment before replying that it was In Tam. They said, “You use the name of the head of state as your commander.� After that, the Khmer Rouge returned me to the cell. During the period of my detention, the Khmer Rouge collected my biography three times. Each time, they forced me to sit on the filthy ground, which was infested with ants which bit my whole body. This happened in 1976. Afterward, I was asked to work in the prison as a blacksmith, which I did until 7 January 1979. During that time, I was kicked many times whenever they were dissatisfied with my work. I was often beaten with a stick if I couldn’t catch up with the rest of the prisoners when we were ordered to run to our cell. At mealtime, the Khmer Rouge gave us corn to eat. We were served only two meals a day, lunch and dinner, with a ladle of corn soup per meal. About 5 to 10 inmates died of hunger each day. In 1977, the Khmer Rouge provided only one ladle of watery gruel per meal for the inmates. After that, at least ten people died of hunger each day. As for water, the prisoners were responsible for finding their own water to drink whenever the Khmer Rouge allowed us to work in the rice fields. At the beginning of my detention, the inmates detained nearby me (around 5 people) died from lack of water to drink because the Khmer Rouge didn’t allow them to drink. |
Date Completion of Form
កាលបរិច្ឆេទនៃការបំពេញបែបបទ
|
20071116 | |
Petitioner
អ្នកដាក់ញ្ញាត់
|
No; | |
Copyright: | © DC-CAM | |
រក្សាសិទ្ធិដោយ: | © មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលឯកសារកម្ពុជា |
Refine your results
Database
Biographic28,821
Bibliographic93,161
Location
Date
1970 to 197515,209
1975 to 198022,829
1980 to 198511,450
1985 to 199012,169
1990 to 199510,122
1995 to 20001,254
2000 to 20104,840
Note that the written permission of the copyright owners and/or other rights holders (such as publicity and/or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Credit Line: Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives.
"Documentation Center of Cambodia's Archives"
This website was funded in part by a grant (Documentation and Democracy) from the United States Department of State. The opinions, findings and conclusions stated herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development.
Concept by Ean Panharith and Youk Chhang
© 2023 Documentation Center of Cambodia
The Prevention and Punishment of the Crimes of Genocide
By Youk Chhang
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide stands alongside the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one of the key pillars of international human rights law, and for this Human Rights Day in 2022, I want to highlight the critical importance of the responsibility to prevent atrocity crimes, which includes genocide. When atrocity crimes occur, there is an immediate need to stop these atrocious acts, followed by the equally urgent tasks of documenting, investigating, and ultimately prosecuting the perpetrators. However, from 1948 to today, we have not given enough attention to true prevention.
Atrocity crimes do not occur in a vacuum. There is a long chain of events and conditions that precede atrocity crimes. Isolation, segregation, and discrimination frequently, if not always, precede the rationalization of atrocity crimes against a group of people. And before people are discriminated against, they must be dehumanized. The process of dehumanization depends upon rationalizing hatred and distrust, and these processes are precipitated by misinformation, fueled by uninformed biases, stereotypes, and exploitative actors. They are also frequently dependent upon the disintegration, corruption, or lack of development of critical institutions, in particular institutions dedicated to dialogue and education. It is here that we must dedicate our greatest attention.
Since 1948, we have made great strides toward taking actions that interrupt, mitigate, and to a very limited extent, punish the chief perpetrators of atrocity crimes; however, these actions are not preventative but reactive in nature. No atrocities crime trial has ever prevented the next genocide, and no sanctions or punishment can bring back the dead or undo the trauma that extends across multiple generations. Indeed, the trauma of atrocity crimes in the distant past are often the forgotten seeds for the next wave of violence and inhumanity of the future.
If we are to truly adopt strategies that are effective, far reaching, and decisive in preventing atrocity crimes, then our priorities must be re-oriented to the opposite end of the spectrum, where the seeds of the next genocide are cultivated. Our responsibility in complying with foundational human rights documents should be measured not solely by our success at responding, investigating, and prosecuting atrocity crimes, but by our efforts in supporting institutions, initiatives, and actions that have a positive influence in preventing all forms of inhumanity. The most effective strategy at preventing the next genocide is centered on actions and policies that interrupt and reduce the risk of escalation at the earliest stages of inhumanity.
Cambodia recently removed human rights days from public calendars. I think we should reconsider this collective decision. Cambodia has achieved extraordinary success in its genocide education programme, which is the essence of atrocity crimes prevention. And so, to capitalize on this success and Cambodia’s regional and even global leadership in this area, we should hold an annual dialogue on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) closes its doors, there is no better time than now to preserve Cambodia’s leadership and momentum in realizing the core objectives of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam) is proud of the support it has given to the ECCC’s work, which was fundamental to giving victims an opportunity to participate in the justice process and realize some sense of closure from the Khmer Rouge genocide. DC-Cam is also eager to support an annual conference on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. As we commemorate this Human Rights Day, we would be mindful to recognize our fundamental human rights documents are not only universal commitments, but also standards for evaluating the kind of world we are leaving for the next generation.
—————
Youk Chhang is Executive Director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia. The Center dedicating to Justice, Memory, and Healing for survivors of the Khmer Rouge genocide.
Photo above: Children at Angkor Wat, 1979. After the collapse of the Khmer Rouge regime on 7 January 1979, hundreds of thousands of children were left orphaned. From 1975 to 1979, the Khmer Rouge led Cambodia into tragedy causing the deaths of over 2 million people. Although two millions were killed, five millions more survived to tell their story. The perpetrators of these crimes also survived. Photo: Documentation Center of Cambodia Archives.
Mansion 11, Street 256
Sangkat Chakto Mukh, Khan Daun Penh
Phnom Penh, 120207, CAMBODIA
t: +855 (0) 92 234 707
e: truthpheana.s@databases.dccam.org
e: dccam@online.com.kh
If you have problem to access, please contact:
Morm Sophat, IT Coordinator
t: +855 (0) 11/16 27 27 22
e: truthsophat.m@databases.dccam.org